Massachusetts Pedestrian Accidents: Navigating the Litigation Funding Process

Massachusetts Pedestrian Accidents Navigating the Litigation Funding Process

Pedestrian accidents can be life-altering events, leaving victims with severe injuries, financial hardships, and a long road to recovery. In Massachusetts, the legal process surrounding pedestrian accidents is often complex and challenging, especially for those trying to seek compensation while dealing with the aftermath of a serious injury. For many victims, litigation can take months or even years, causing significant financial strain. This is where litigation funding plays a crucial role, providing plaintiffs with financial assistance while their case progresses.

Fast Funds Badges

Understanding pedestrian accidents in Massachusetts, the litigation process, and how funding options work can empower victims and their families to make informed decisions. In this comprehensive discussion, we will explore the key aspects of pedestrian accidents in Massachusetts and outline the steps for navigating the litigation funding process, ensuring that victims can seek the justice they deserve without facing overwhelming financial pressure.

The Prevalence of Pedestrian Accidents in Massachusetts

Pedestrian accidents are a growing concern in Massachusetts, particularly in urban areas where foot traffic and motor vehicle interactions are frequent. Whether in cities like Boston or smaller towns, pedestrians face risks every day. Massachusetts state law recognizes the vulnerability of pedestrians and has enacted several regulations to protect them. However, despite these protective measures, pedestrian accidents continue to occur, often resulting in severe injuries or fatalities.

In most cases, pedestrian accidents are caused by factors such as driver negligence, distracted driving, speeding, failure to yield, or poor visibility. However, pedestrians may also bear some responsibility if they fail to follow traffic rules or act recklessly. Determining fault in a pedestrian accident is crucial in the litigation process, as it impacts the potential compensation a victim can receive.

- WHAT CLIENTS ARE SAYING -

In June, my wife and I asked our attorney about giving us a loan against any settlement proceeds from our case. He told us that the state bar does not
permit lawyers to participate in the financing of clients. The offer of settlement was very low so the case needed to be filed in court. I called Fast Funds. Within 24 hours, I had entered into an agreement with them, selling a very small portion of the anticipated proceeds to them in exchange for immediate financing. Now my suit is in court and I don't have to worry about money until it's outcome. Thank god for Fast Funds
B.G.
As a result of the advances you have made to our client, we were able to refuse an extremely low settlement offer and take the case to court. We settled the day of the trial for a very generous sum. Had there been no advances by Fast Funds, our client would have had no choice but to accept the inadequate offer since he was in severe debt due to his inability to work. Thank you for your helpful assistance in providing our client with the ability to persevere.
C.F.
I was involved in an accident which took my left leg. I was forced to live homeless for eleven months. Thanks to the Fast Funds people advancing money. I now live in an apartment,I am walking on a prosthetic and otherwise getting my life back together, even though my attorney has not yet settled my lawsuit. I don't know what I would have done for money because the insurance company has offered nothing so far.
A.R.S.
I was involved in an auto accident which caused me to suffer a herniated disc. Because of this injury, I was forced to miss many months of work. I had no income and no place or person to turn to for money. My attorney told me he was unable to help with any financing and the insurance company was refusing to settle the case. I turned to a company called Fast funds. They immediately reviewed my file and took the financial pressure off by providing me with interim financing. I am now able to wait for as long as it takes for my lawyer to achieve a successful result in my case. Without the financial involvement of Fast Funds, I don't know what I would have done.
K.P.
I wanted to thank you for your sensitivity in helping me cope through a very difficult time in my life. Without your help, I would have been unable to pay my rent , forcing my wife and children to be put on the street. I have not been able to return to work and I was tempted to accept the insurance company's very low offer to settle, even though I knew it was not fair or reasonable. You have given me the ability to withstand the financial pressures. Thanks for your help. I will never forget it
C.S.
I have in the past referred clients to Fast Funds Inc., a non-recourse company. The experience of my clients
and my firm were totally positive. Fast Funds was responsive to the clients financial and emotional needs, provided the necessary emergency money and did not interfere in any manner with my handling of the cases. The clients, without my input, negotiated the advance directly with the company. In each case, they were completely satisfied with the final result of the case, including the amount of profit earned by Fast Funds. Non-recourse funding is clearly a valuable tool to the plaintiff's attorney.
M.J.L.
"I am writing to recommend the valuable assistance of the Fast Funds Inc., a company that provided interim funding to financially needy clients. They help to insure that a case will be brought to a successful resolution. A good case in point is when I was offered $75,000.00 for a seriously injured client. Had she not been able to take advantage of the advance financing offered by Fast Funds, I would have been forced to take the money. As it turned out, because my client now had the financial ability to withstand the pressures of time, I tried the case to a jury and received a verdict of $315,000.00.
M.S.D.
It is my belief that non-recourse companies, such as Fast Funds, the company to whom I refer my needy clients, perform an invaluable service to both the client and the attorney. Simply put, it is common knowledge that one of the tools negotiation utilized by insurance companies is time. Offering
considerably less money than the actual case value to a client in desperate need of funds while the case is pending, gives the insurance companies a tremendous advantage. This advantage is minimized and the playing field is leveled when the client has the ability to obtain funds for a minimal portion of the anticipated proceeds. Many times, with no prospects of income, an injured party will settle the case for whatever offer is made.
R.J.F.

Legal Considerations in Massachusetts Pedestrian Accident Cases

When a pedestrian is injured in an accident, they have the right to pursue compensation for their injuries and related expenses through a personal injury claim. Massachusetts follows a modified comparative fault system, meaning that if a pedestrian is found to be partially at fault for the accident, their compensation may be reduced proportionally to their percentage of fault. For instance, if a pedestrian is deemed to be 20 percent at fault for the accident, their final award will be reduced by 20 percent.

The compensation that pedestrian accident victims may be entitled to can cover medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. However, pursuing a personal injury claim can be complicated, requiring extensive documentation, evidence gathering, and legal experience. Insurance companies representing the at-fault driver often attempt to minimize payouts, adding to the challenges faced by victims. These legal hurdles make it crucial for victims to have a strong legal advocate on their side throughout the litigation process.

The Role of Litigation Funding in Pedestrian Accident Cases

For many victims, the time between filing a personal injury claim and receiving a settlement can be lengthy. During this period, medical bills, living expenses, and other financial obligations can accumulate, placing significant strain on victims and their families. Litigation funding, also known as lawsuit funding or pre-settlement funding, is designed to alleviate this burden by providing financial assistance while a case is still ongoing.

Litigation funding is essentially a cash advance provided to plaintiffs based on the expected outcome of their case. The funding company evaluates the strength of the case and, if approved, advances a portion of the anticipated settlement to the plaintiff. Unlike traditional loans, litigation funding does not require monthly payments or credit checks. Instead, repayment is contingent on the outcome of the case. If the plaintiff wins or settles the case, they repay the advance from the proceeds. If they lose the case, they are not required to repay the funding.

For victims of pedestrian accidents, litigation funding can be a lifeline, allowing them to cover essential expenses such as medical treatments, rent, and daily living costs while they wait for their case to resolve. This financial support can provide peace of mind, enabling victims to focus on their recovery and legal proceedings without the added stress of financial difficulties.

Related Videos

Applying For Lawsuit Funding

Types of Cases We Fund

How the Litigation Funding Process Works

The litigation funding process typically begins once a pedestrian accident victim has filed a personal injury claim and retained legal representation. To be eligible for funding, the plaintiff must have a valid, ongoing case with a reasonable chance of success. The funding company will assess the case’s merits, including the evidence, liability, and potential damages. This evaluation is typically done in collaboration with the plaintiff’s attorney, who provides key case details to the funding company.

Once the funding company has reviewed the case and determined it is viable, they will offer the plaintiff a funding agreement. This agreement outlines the terms of the funding, including the amount advanced and the repayment conditions. If the plaintiff agrees to the terms, they will receive the funds, which they can use to cover their immediate financial needs.

It is important to note that litigation funding is non-recourse, meaning that if the plaintiff does not win or settle their case, they are not obligated to repay the advance. This feature makes litigation funding a low-risk option for pedestrian accident victims who need financial assistance during the legal process.

Key Considerations for Plaintiffs Seeking Litigation Funding

While litigation funding can provide essential financial relief for pedestrian accident victims, it is not a decision to be taken lightly. Plaintiffs should carefully consider the terms of the funding agreement, including the fees and interest rates associated with the advance. Some litigation funding companies may charge higher fees than others, which can reduce the amount of the final settlement that plaintiffs receive after repayment.

Additionally, plaintiffs should work closely with their attorneys to ensure that litigation funding is a viable option for their case. An experienced attorney can provide valuable insight into the case’s potential value and the likelihood of success, helping plaintiffs make an informed decision about whether to pursue funding.

It is also important for plaintiffs to understand that litigation funding is meant to provide short-term financial relief, not to cover long-term expenses. The amount of funding provided is typically limited to a percentage of the expected settlement, and plaintiffs should use the funds judiciously to ensure they are available for essential needs throughout the duration of the case.

Massachusetts Laws Regarding Litigation Funding

Massachusetts, like many states, does not have comprehensive regulations governing litigation funding. However, the state’s legal framework does provide some protections for plaintiffs who seek this type of financial assistance. For example, litigation funding agreements must be transparent, with clear terms and conditions that are fully disclosed to the plaintiff.

Massachusetts courts also recognize the importance of ensuring that plaintiffs are not taken advantage of by unscrupulous funding companies. If a litigation funding agreement is deemed to be unfair or predatory, the court may intervene to protect the plaintiff’s interests. As such, it is essential for plaintiffs to choose a reputable litigation funding company that adheres to ethical practices and provides fair terms.

The Benefits of Litigation Funding for Pedestrian Accident Victims

For victims of pedestrian accidents in Massachusetts, litigation funding offers several benefits. First and foremost, it provides immediate financial relief, allowing plaintiffs to cover necessary expenses without waiting for their case to resolve. This can be particularly important for those who are unable to work due to their injuries and face mounting medical bills and living costs.

Litigation funding also enables plaintiffs to pursue their case without feeling pressured to accept a low settlement offer from the insurance company. In many cases, insurance companies will attempt to settle quickly for a lower amount, knowing that plaintiffs may be in financial distress. With litigation funding, plaintiffs can afford to wait for a fair settlement or trial outcome without compromising their financial stability.

Finally, litigation funding provides plaintiffs with peace of mind. By relieving the financial stress associated with a lengthy legal process, plaintiffs can focus on their recovery and the progression of their case, knowing that they have the resources they need to manage their day-to-day expenses.

Choosing a Litigation Funding Company

Selecting the right litigation funding company is a critical decision for pedestrian accident victims in Massachusetts. Plaintiffs should look for a company with a solid reputation, transparent terms, and a commitment to ethical practices. Working with a reputable funding company can ensure that plaintiffs receive fair terms and avoid excessive fees or interest rates.

It is also important for plaintiffs to consult with their attorney before entering into a funding agreement. An attorney can review the terms of the agreement and advise the plaintiff on whether the funding is in their best interest. By working closely with their legal team and choosing a reputable funding provider, plaintiffs can navigate the litigation funding process with confidence and secure the financial support they need.

Pedestrian accident victims in Massachusetts face numerous challenges as they pursue compensation for their injuries. The legal process can be long and complex, placing significant financial strain on victims and their families. Litigation funding offers a valuable solution, providing financial assistance while a case progresses and allowing plaintiffs to focus on their recovery. For those navigating the legal system, Fast Funds can help ensure that you have the resources you need to move forward confidently. Reach out today to learn more about how we can support your case and provide the funding necessary to pursue the justice you deserve.