Lawsuit Funding

Understanding the Difference Between Lawsuit Loans and Settlement Advances

Posted on by Fast Funds
Understanding the Difference Between Lawsuit Loans and Settlement Advances
15
Jul

Navigating the complexities of legal proceedings can be daunting, particularly when financial strains arise due to extended litigation. Plaintiffs often face significant financial hardships while waiting for a resolution, making alternative financing options like lawsuit loans and settlement advances increasingly appealing. Although these terms are sometimes used interchangeably, they represent distinct financial products with unique features and implications. Understanding the differences between lawsuit loans and settlement advances is crucial for plaintiffs seeking financial relief during their legal battles.

Fast Funds Badges

Lawsuit Loans

Lawsuit loans — also known as pre-settlement funding — provide plaintiffs with immediate financial assistance by offering a cash advance against their anticipated settlement. This type of funding is typically provided by third-party lenders who evaluate the merits of the case and the likelihood of a successful outcome before approving the loan. The primary benefit of a lawsuit loan is that it offers plaintiffs quick access to funds that can be used to cover various expenses such as medical bills, rent, and daily living costs.

Unlike traditional loans, lawsuit loans are non-recourse, meaning that repayment is contingent upon the plaintiff winning or settling the case. If the plaintiff loses the case, they are not obligated to repay the loan. This non-recourse nature makes lawsuit loans an attractive option for plaintiffs with limited financial resources, as it minimizes the financial risk associated with borrowing. However, it is important to note that lawsuit loans often come with high interest rates and fees, which can significantly increase the total repayment amount if the case drags on for an extended period.

Settlement Advances

Settlement advances, on the other hand, function as an advance on the plaintiff’s anticipated settlement amount. Unlike lawsuit loans, settlement advances are typically offered by law firms or settlement advance companies rather than third-party lenders. These advances are provided based on the expected settlement amount, and the funds are usually deducted from the final settlement once it is received.

The primary advantage of settlement advances is that they generally come with lower fees and interest rates compared to lawsuit loans. This makes them a more cost-effective option for plaintiffs who are confident in the likelihood of a favorable settlement. Additionally, because the advance is based on the anticipated settlement, the approval process is often quicker and less stringent than that of a lawsuit loan. This allows plaintiffs to receive funds more rapidly, providing much-needed financial relief during the litigation process.

- WHAT CLIENTS ARE SAYING -

In June, my wife and I asked our attorney about giving us a loan against any settlement proceeds from our case. He told us that the state bar does not
permit lawyers to participate in the financing of clients. The offer of settlement was very low so the case needed to be filed in court. I called Fast Funds. Within 24 hours, I had entered into an agreement with them, selling a very small portion of the anticipated proceeds to them in exchange for immediate financing. Now my suit is in court and I don't have to worry about money until it's outcome. Thank god for Fast Funds
B.G.
As a result of the advances you have made to our client, we were able to refuse an extremely low settlement offer and take the case to court. We settled the day of the trial for a very generous sum. Had there been no advances by Fast Funds, our client would have had no choice but to accept the inadequate offer since he was in severe debt due to his inability to work. Thank you for your helpful assistance in providing our client with the ability to persevere.
C.F.
I was involved in an accident which took my left leg. I was forced to live homeless for eleven months. Thanks to the Fast Funds people advancing money. I now live in an apartment,I am walking on a prosthetic and otherwise getting my life back together, even though my attorney has not yet settled my lawsuit. I don't know what I would have done for money because the insurance company has offered nothing so far.
A.R.S.
I was involved in an auto accident which caused me to suffer a herniated disc. Because of this injury, I was forced to miss many months of work. I had no income and no place or person to turn to for money. My attorney told me he was unable to help with any financing and the insurance company was refusing to settle the case. I turned to a company called Fast funds. They immediately reviewed my file and took the financial pressure off by providing me with interim financing. I am now able to wait for as long as it takes for my lawyer to achieve a successful result in my case. Without the financial involvement of Fast Funds, I don't know what I would have done.
K.P.
I wanted to thank you for your sensitivity in helping me cope through a very difficult time in my life. Without your help, I would have been unable to pay my rent , forcing my wife and children to be put on the street. I have not been able to return to work and I was tempted to accept the insurance company's very low offer to settle, even though I knew it was not fair or reasonable. You have given me the ability to withstand the financial pressures. Thanks for your help. I will never forget it
C.S.
I have in the past referred clients to Fast Funds Inc., a non-recourse company. The experience of my clients
and my firm were totally positive. Fast Funds was responsive to the clients financial and emotional needs, provided the necessary emergency money and did not interfere in any manner with my handling of the cases. The clients, without my input, negotiated the advance directly with the company. In each case, they were completely satisfied with the final result of the case, including the amount of profit earned by Fast Funds. Non-recourse funding is clearly a valuable tool to the plaintiff's attorney.
M.J.L.
"I am writing to recommend the valuable assistance of the Fast Funds Inc., a company that provided interim funding to financially needy clients. They help to insure that a case will be brought to a successful resolution. A good case in point is when I was offered $75,000.00 for a seriously injured client. Had she not been able to take advantage of the advance financing offered by Fast Funds, I would have been forced to take the money. As it turned out, because my client now had the financial ability to withstand the pressures of time, I tried the case to a jury and received a verdict of $315,000.00.
M.S.D.
It is my belief that non-recourse companies, such as Fast Funds, the company to whom I refer my needy clients, perform an invaluable service to both the client and the attorney. Simply put, it is common knowledge that one of the tools negotiation utilized by insurance companies is time. Offering
considerably less money than the actual case value to a client in desperate need of funds while the case is pending, gives the insurance companies a tremendous advantage. This advantage is minimized and the playing field is leveled when the client has the ability to obtain funds for a minimal portion of the anticipated proceeds. Many times, with no prospects of income, an injured party will settle the case for whatever offer is made.
R.J.F.

Key Differences Between Lawsuit Loans and Settlement Advances

Although both lawsuit loans and settlement advances aim to provide plaintiffs with financial assistance during legal proceedings, there are several key differences between the two that plaintiffs should consider before making a decision.

First, the source of the funding differs significantly between the two options. Lawsuit loans are provided by third-party lenders who focus in legal financing, whereas settlement advances are typically offered by law firms or settlement advance companies. This distinction can impact the approval process, interest rates, and fees associated with each option.

Second, the repayment structure of lawsuit loans and settlement advances varies. Lawsuit loans are non-recourse, meaning that repayment is only required if the plaintiff wins or settles the case. In contrast, settlement advances are usually deducted from the final settlement amount, regardless of the outcome of the case. This means that plaintiffs who receive a settlement advance will need to repay the advance even if the settlement amount is lower than expected or if they lose the case.

Another important difference is the cost associated with each option. Lawsuit loans often come with higher interest rates and fees due to the increased risk taken on by the lender. This can result in a significantly higher repayment amount if the case takes a long time to resolve. Settlement advances, on the other hand, typically have lower interest rates and fees, making them a more affordable option for plaintiffs who are confident in their case’s outcome.

Finally, the approval process for lawsuit loans is generally more stringent than that of settlement advances. Because third-party lenders take on more risk with lawsuit loans, they often require extensive documentation and a thorough evaluation of the case’s merits before approving the loan. Settlement advances, being based on the anticipated settlement amount, usually have a quicker and less rigorous approval process, allowing plaintiffs to receive funds more rapidly.

Related Videos

Applying For Lawsuit Funding

Types of Cases We Fund

Choosing the Right Option for Your Situation

When deciding between a lawsuit loan and a settlement advance, plaintiffs should carefully consider their financial needs, the expected timeline of their case, and their confidence in the case’s outcome. Each option has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, and the best choice will depend on the plaintiff’s unique circumstances.

For plaintiffs who need immediate financial relief and are confident in the likelihood of a favorable settlement, a settlement advance may be the more cost-effective and convenient option. The lower interest rates and fees associated with settlement advances can help plaintiffs save money in the long run, while the quicker approval process allows them to access funds more rapidly.

On the other hand, plaintiffs who are uncertain about the outcome of their case or who require more substantial financial assistance may find a lawsuit loan to be a better fit. The non-recourse nature of lawsuit loans provides a safety net for plaintiffs, as they are not obligated to repay the loan if they lose the case. However, plaintiffs should be mindful of the higher interest rates and fees associated with lawsuit loans and consider the potential financial implications if the case takes longer than expected to resolve.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

In addition to the financial aspects, plaintiffs should also consider the legal and ethical implications of obtaining a lawsuit loan or settlement advance. It is important to work with reputable lenders or advance companies that adhere to industry standards and regulations. Plaintiffs should thoroughly research potential lenders and advance companies, read reviews, and consult with their attorney to ensure they are making an informed decision.

Furthermore, plaintiffs should be aware of the potential impact that obtaining a lawsuit loan or settlement advance may have on their case. Some defendants and insurance companies may view the plaintiff’s need for financial assistance as a sign of financial desperation, which could potentially influence settlement negotiations. Plaintiffs should discuss these concerns with their attorney and carefully weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks before proceeding with either option.

The Role of Attorneys in the Decision-Making Process

Attorneys play a crucial role in guiding plaintiffs through the decision-making process when considering a lawsuit loan or settlement advance. An experienced attorney can provide valuable insights into the potential outcomes of the case, the likelihood of a favorable settlement, and the anticipated timeline for resolution. This information can help plaintiffs make an informed decision about which financing option is best suited to their needs.

Additionally, attorneys can assist plaintiffs in negotiating the terms of the loan or advance, ensuring that they receive fair and transparent terms. Attorneys can also help plaintiffs navigate the legal and ethical considerations associated with obtaining a lawsuit loan or settlement advance, providing guidance on how to minimize any potential negative impact on the case.

The Financial Implications of Extended Litigation

Extended litigation can place a significant financial burden on plaintiffs, particularly those who are unable to work due to their injuries or who face mounting medical bills and other expenses. Lawsuit loans and settlement advances can provide much-needed financial relief during this challenging time, allowing plaintiffs to focus on their recovery and the legal proceedings without the added stress of financial instability.

However, it is important for plaintiffs to carefully consider the financial implications of each option before proceeding. While lawsuit loans and settlement advances can provide immediate funds, they also come with costs that must be repaid once the case is resolved. Plaintiffs should work closely with their attorney to evaluate the potential costs and benefits of each option, ensuring that they make a decision that aligns with their financial needs and long-term goals.

Making an Informed Decision

Ultimately, the decision between a lawsuit loan and a settlement advance is a personal one that will depend on the plaintiff’s unique circumstances and financial needs. By understanding the key differences between these two options, plaintiffs can make an informed decision that best supports their financial stability and overall well-being during the litigation process.

Plaintiffs should take the time to thoroughly research potential lenders and advance companies, consult with their attorney, and carefully consider the financial and legal implications of each option. By doing so, they can ensure that they choose the financing solution that best meets their needs and supports their journey towards a successful resolution of their case.

If you are considering a lawsuit loan or settlement advance and need guidance on which option is best for your situation, Fast Funds is here to help. Our team of experienced professionals understands the complexities of legal financing and is committed to providing you with the support and resources you need to make an informed decision. Contact Fast Funds today to learn more about our services and how we can assist you in navigating the financial challenges of your legal journey.