Why Some Plaintiffs Are Denied Funding and How to Strengthen a Second Request

Why Some Plaintiffs Are Denied Funding and How to Strengthen a Second Request

Securing lawsuit funding can be a critical lifeline for plaintiffs pursuing lengthy legal battles. At Fast Funds, Inc., we understand the financial strains that can come with waiting for a case to settle. Plaintiffs often rely on litigation funding to cover living expenses and other costs during the legal process. However, some plaintiffs find themselves initially denied funding, which can feel like a setback. Fortunately, if you’ve been turned down, there are ways to improve your chances of securing funding the second time around. This guide will explore why some plaintiffs are denied funding and provide insights on how to strengthen your request to give you a better chance of success.

Fast Funds Badges

Why Are Plaintiffs Denied Funding in the First Place? Why Some Plaintiffs Are Denied Funding and How to Strengthen a Second Request

There are several common reasons why plaintiffs may be denied funding for their lawsuits. A better understanding of these reasons can give you the opportunity to address these issues when making a second request. Some key factors that contribute to a denial include:

1. Insufficient Case Strength

Funding companies need to assess the likelihood of a successful outcome in your case before offering an advance. If your case lacks sufficient evidence, weak legal arguments, or unclear liability, the funding company might see it as too risky to invest in. This is often a primary reason for a denial.

In the eyes of litigation funders, the strength of the case is crucial. They want to see that there is a solid chance for a favorable outcome, whether it’s a win in court or a significant settlement. Without clear evidence supporting your claim, such as witness testimony, expert opinions, or definitive liability, your application for funding is likely to be rejected.

2. Inadequate Financial Documentation

Another common reason for denial is the failure to provide adequate documentation that clearly explains your financial situation. If you can’t prove your financial need, the funders may question why you need an advance and whether it’s necessary to move forward with your case.

Without proper financial documentation, including details about your expenses, debts, medical bills, and other financial obligations, the funding company may have no way to assess how urgently you require the funds. This can weaken your application and lead to a denial.

- WHAT CLIENTS ARE SAYING -

In June, my wife and I asked our attorney about giving us a loan against any settlement proceeds from our case. He told us that the state bar does not
permit lawyers to participate in the financing of clients. The offer of settlement was very low so the case needed to be filed in court. I called Fast Funds. Within 24 hours, I had entered into an agreement with them, selling a very small portion of the anticipated proceeds to them in exchange for immediate financing. Now my suit is in court and I don't have to worry about money until it's outcome. Thank god for Fast Funds
B.G.
As a result of the advances you have made to our client, we were able to refuse an extremely low settlement offer and take the case to court. We settled the day of the trial for a very generous sum. Had there been no advances by Fast Funds, our client would have had no choice but to accept the inadequate offer since he was in severe debt due to his inability to work. Thank you for your helpful assistance in providing our client with the ability to persevere.
C.F.
I was involved in an accident which took my left leg. I was forced to live homeless for eleven months. Thanks to the Fast Funds people advancing money. I now live in an apartment,I am walking on a prosthetic and otherwise getting my life back together, even though my attorney has not yet settled my lawsuit. I don't know what I would have done for money because the insurance company has offered nothing so far.
A.R.S.
I was involved in an auto accident which caused me to suffer a herniated disc. Because of this injury, I was forced to miss many months of work. I had no income and no place or person to turn to for money. My attorney told me he was unable to help with any financing and the insurance company was refusing to settle the case. I turned to a company called Fast funds. They immediately reviewed my file and took the financial pressure off by providing me with interim financing. I am now able to wait for as long as it takes for my lawyer to achieve a successful result in my case. Without the financial involvement of Fast Funds, I don't know what I would have done.
K.P.
I wanted to thank you for your sensitivity in helping me cope through a very difficult time in my life. Without your help, I would have been unable to pay my rent , forcing my wife and children to be put on the street. I have not been able to return to work and I was tempted to accept the insurance company's very low offer to settle, even though I knew it was not fair or reasonable. You have given me the ability to withstand the financial pressures. Thanks for your help. I will never forget it
C.S.
I have in the past referred clients to Fast Funds Inc., a non-recourse company. The experience of my clients
and my firm were totally positive. Fast Funds was responsive to the clients financial and emotional needs, provided the necessary emergency money and did not interfere in any manner with my handling of the cases. The clients, without my input, negotiated the advance directly with the company. In each case, they were completely satisfied with the final result of the case, including the amount of profit earned by Fast Funds. Non-recourse funding is clearly a valuable tool to the plaintiff's attorney.
M.J.L.
"I am writing to recommend the valuable assistance of the Fast Funds Inc., a company that provided interim funding to financially needy clients. They help to insure that a case will be brought to a successful resolution. A good case in point is when I was offered $75,000.00 for a seriously injured client. Had she not been able to take advantage of the advance financing offered by Fast Funds, I would have been forced to take the money. As it turned out, because my client now had the financial ability to withstand the pressures of time, I tried the case to a jury and received a verdict of $315,000.00.
M.S.D.
It is my belief that non-recourse companies, such as Fast Funds, the company to whom I refer my needy clients, perform an invaluable service to both the client and the attorney. Simply put, it is common knowledge that one of the tools negotiation utilized by insurance companies is time. Offering
considerably less money than the actual case value to a client in desperate need of funds while the case is pending, gives the insurance companies a tremendous advantage. This advantage is minimized and the playing field is leveled when the client has the ability to obtain funds for a minimal portion of the anticipated proceeds. Many times, with no prospects of income, an injured party will settle the case for whatever offer is made.
R.J.F.

3. Attorney Cooperation Issues

Many lawsuit funding companies require confirmation from your attorney that they are working diligently on your case. If your attorney is unresponsive or unwilling to cooperate with the funding company, it could lead to your request being rejected. Some companies also require the attorney to confirm that there are no outstanding issues preventing the case from moving forward smoothly.

If your attorney is not cooperating or if they are not providing the necessary documentation or confirmation of their commitment to your case, it can create doubts for the funding company about the success of the lawsuit. This can be a significant barrier to approval.

4. Unfavorable Settlement Value Projections

Funding companies will often assess the potential value of your case based on its projected settlement amount. If they believe your case will not result in a large settlement, they may decide that funding is too risky or not financially feasible. This is another common reason why plaintiffs are denied funding.

Settlement value predictions are made based on the complexity of the case, the strength of the evidence, and the amount of damages sought. If your case does not seem likely to result in a favorable settlement or a large payout, the funding company may feel that the investment is not worth it.

Related Videos

Applying For Lawsuit Funding

Types of Cases We Fund

5. Unclear Case Details or Missing Information

If your initial application for funding lacks the clarity and detail necessary for the funding company to properly assess your case, it can result in a denial. Missing documentation, vague case descriptions, or failure to provide all the necessary information will likely hinder your chances of approval.

Being thorough in your application, providing clear and detailed descriptions of your case, and ensuring that all required documents are included will help make the review process smoother and increase your chances of securing funding.

How to Strengthen Your Second Request for Funding

Being denied lawsuit funding doesn’t mean you should give up. In fact, many plaintiffs are able to successfully obtain funding on their second request by addressing the issues that led to the initial denial. If you’ve been turned down once, here are several strategies you can use to improve your chances when you reapply.

1. Strengthen Your Case with More Evidence

If your case was initially denied due to insufficient evidence, it’s time to bolster your claim. Work with your attorney to gather additional documentation that supports your case, such as expert reports, updated medical records, additional witness statements, or other critical evidence.

More compelling and well-organized evidence can help funders see that your case has a strong chance of success. This can change their perspective on the potential of your case and make it more likely that you’ll be approved for funding in a second round.

2. Provide Clear Financial Documentation

If the lack of financial documentation contributed to the initial denial, ensure that your second request includes a comprehensive breakdown of your financial situation. Be sure to include details such as:

  • Medical bills
  • Monthly living expenses
  • Outstanding debts or obligations
  • Proof of income (or lack thereof)

The more clear and detailed you are about your financial need, the easier it will be for the funding company to assess whether you qualify for a cash advance. Be honest and transparent about your financial situation to avoid any doubts that could lead to a second rejection.

3. Improve Attorney Cooperation

If your attorney was unresponsive during the first application, make sure that they are fully on board for the second request. Communicate with your attorney and ensure that they understand the importance of their involvement in the funding process.

Ask your attorney to provide all necessary documentation, such as a confirmation of their commitment to the case, expected timelines, and any updates on the progress of the lawsuit. A cooperative attorney who is willing to work with the funding company can make a significant difference in the approval process.

4. Provide a Revised Settlement Projection

If your initial application was denied because the funding company did not believe your case would result in a significant settlement, consider providing updated information that could change their perspective. If new evidence or developments in your case suggest that the settlement value could be higher than originally predicted, share this information in your second request.

If you’ve made progress in your case, such as receiving positive rulings or uncovering new evidence that strengthens your position, make sure to highlight these developments. A more favorable outlook can improve your chances of being approved for funding.

5. Clarify the Necessity of the Funds

Ensure that your second request clearly demonstrates why you need the funding and how it will help you move forward with your case. Include any new financial challenges you may have faced since your first application, such as increased medical expenses or lost wages, and emphasize the importance of securing the funds to continue pursuing your lawsuit.

A well-articulated explanation of your financial need and how the funds will be used is essential for convincing the funding company that the advance is necessary and justified.

What to Expect During the Second Request Process

The second request for funding may involve a more thorough review process than the first one. Be prepared for the funding company to ask for additional documentation or clarifications, especially if there were any areas of concern in your initial application. You may also be asked to provide updates on the status of your case and any new developments.

Funding companies will closely scrutinize the revised details of your case and financial situation, so it’s important to be as thorough and transparent as possible.

Expect that the funding company will carefully assess the updated evidence, financial documents, and case projections. This may take some time, but if your case now meets the company’s criteria, they will likely approve your second request for funding.

While being denied funding the first time can be frustrating, it’s not the end of the road. By addressing the issues that led to the initial denial and strengthening your second request, you can greatly improve your chances of receiving the lawsuit funding you need. Working closely with your attorney, providing thorough and updated documentation, and offering a clearer picture of your financial situation are key steps to increasing your approval odds.

If you need assistance with the funding process or have questions about your eligibility, don’t hesitate to reach out to Fast Funds, Inc. Our team is here to guide you through every step of the lawsuit funding process, from initial applications to securing second-round funding.

To learn more about this subject click here: How Plaintiffs Use Lawsuit Funding to Keep Bills Covered During Long Cases